Laboratory name change spells trouble

Re: “The National Renewable Energy Lab is renamed,” Dec. 3 news story

Changing the name of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to the National Laboratory of the Rockies may seem inconsequential to the casual newsreader, but it’s a true harbinger of this administration’s brutal neutralizing of clean energy technology development in the United States.

It’s hard to know what the “Laboratory of the Rockies” will actually be; maybe something like analyzing professional baseball in Colorado or such. Regardless, the laboratory will soon lose its position as the leading applied science lab in the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Laboratory System for developing marketable, clean energy technologies. This has been done primarily through NREL’s long-term research relationships with American business concerns.

Three more years of slash-and-burn of these relationships will cause irreparable harm to American leadership in this critical 21st-century sector, allowing China dominance for years to come. Bad news for Colorado, bad news for the United States. Very sad.

John A. Herrick, Denver

Editor’s note: Herrick is a former chief counsel for the Department of Energy’s Golden Field Office.

Forty-one years have elapsed since constructed in 1984, but hey, it’s never too late to make a change. “Renewable energy” is no longer permissible under the “climate realism” Orwellian newspeak of the new regime. The buildings remain in place on the southern slope of South Table Mountain in Golden, but the National Renewable Energy Lab is now the National Laboratory of the Rockies. Wonder what they will be doing there?

Phil Nelson, Golden

Putting on chains altogether now

Re: “Law requires anti-slip devices for 2WD vehicles,” Nov. 22 news story

Can CDOT and the state legislature as a whole imagine the drivers of all two-wheel drive vehicles on many miles of Interstate 70 stopping at the same time to install “anti-slip devices” when snows begin? That is what their new law requires. And notably, many miles of the highway now have an express lane, which “disappeared” formerly safe shoulders. Additionally, if you happen to have an all-wheel drive vehicle, note that if you are rolling on the last 59% of your thousand-dollar tire set’s tread in such weather, you will be breaking the law as well.

Thanks, to all of the genius legislators who so badly want to please the ski industry lobby.

Peter Ehrlich, Denver

License plata data as boogeyman is oversold

Re: “Big Brother is tracking you – Denver’s descent into dystopia,” Nov. 30  commentary

Robin Reichhardt’s column oversells and underdelivers by a mile. Renewing an existing license plate contract is clearly not a “descent” into anything, and the details are as mundane as the license plate cameras on our toll lanes and money trees, er, mobile speed cameras. The piece misses a glaring point: The plate data is hard deleted after 30 days. While police can search it later, it’s not much later.

Among other things the author doesn’t like are data centers, which she used her imagination in describing and tying to Big Brother Denver. The internet is complicated, but there’s no causation between the license plate cameras and the CoreSite — or any other local data center. Flock’s data is not stored in Colorado. Even if it were, plate records contribute no meaningful portion to data center capacity, which is almost entirely videos of attractive people doing banal tasks, cat videos, and, of course, porn.

I do appreciate the writer’s description of herself as a “community organizer” rather than an “informed citizen.”

Bradley Rehak, Denver

Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.

Plaudits for bipartisanship! Dan Rubinstein, the Republican Mesa County district attorney and Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, a Democrat, urged Gov. Jared Polis in a recent letter not to acquiesce to demands by the Trump administration to transfer former Mesa County clerk Tina Peters to federal custody. Another letter by the Colorado County Clerks Association counsels the same.

They are right. Under no circumstances should Peters be transferred out of La Vista Correctional Facility in Pueblo, where she is serving a nine-year sentence. Peters committed multiple felonies in connection with an illegal 2021 scheme to grant unauthorized access to voting equipment in an attempt to prove the election was stolen from her candidate. Peters’ crimes cost taxpayers millions of dollars to replace equipment compromised by her actions and for legal fees, investigations, recounts and other costs. Her election lies fueled harassment and threats to clerks, their staffs, and even their family members, and diminished the public’s trust in elections.

No one is surprised that President Donald Trump is working to free Peters from the grip of justice. He has pardoned most everyone charged with crimes related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. First, he granted clemency to nearly all of the rioters who attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, even those convicted of assaulting police officers. Trump also ordered the Department of Justice to dismiss any cases still pending against perpetrators of violence. Later, he pardoned the architects of his election subversion conspiracy – liars, I mean, lawyers Jenna Ellis, John Eastman, Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell. Now it’s Peters’ turn to receive her get-out-of-jail card.

After a few months of truculent, all-caps argle-bargle on social media demanding her release, Trump is now trying other means to liberate her from accountability. He cannot pardon Peters since she was convicted of breaking state laws, but that won’t stop him from trying. On Nov. 12, the Federal Bureau of Prisons sent a letter to the Colorado Department of Corrections requesting Peters be transferred to federal custody.

Not only would this circumvent our justice system here in Colorado, as Rubinstein and Weiser’s letter points out, it also would “offer a politically connected inmate the comforts of an easier sentence. This is not mere speculation or conjecture, as one need only to review recent reports on other politically connected criminals presently receiving ‘preferential treatment’ in federal facilities during their sentences.”

Is this an oblique reference to a certain associate of Jeffrey Epstein’s who was sent to prison for sex trafficking? Ghislaine Maxwell’s sentence got a bit cushier after being transferred from a federal prison in Florida to a minimum-security one in Bryan, Texas. Maybe Peters can get that magnetic mattress she says she needs if transferred to a new facility.

It’s more likely that once transferred, a bureaucratic “error” would spring Peters. When was the last time the Trump administration let law get in the way? Peters would be free to continue her public recrimination of election clerks, again putting them in harm’s way.

At no point has the jailbird shown contrition for her crimes. Peters’ fans and enablers continue to help her maintain the fantasy of victimhood. Peters’ lead attorney, Peter Ticktin, one of the attorneys who helped secure pardons for the Jan. 6 insurrectionists, confessed in a recent interview that  Peters is “not embarrassed or ashamed in any way. She’s proud of what she’s done because she’s not a criminal.” Meanwhile, her pal, far-right podcaster Joe Oltmann, said Colorado’s governor, attorney general and Secretary of State Jena Griswold “should be hung.”

To release Peters into federal custody, thereby securing an easier sentence or outright release, would not only undermine our justice system, it also would encourage people like Oltmann who spout lies and advocate violence. Colorado Republicans and Democrats who uphold truth and justice cannot stop the release of criminals at the federal level, but we can stop that travesty of justice from happening here.

Krista Kafer is a Sunday Denver Post columnist.

Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.