Colorado Parks and Wildlife employees are in the crosshairs, caught between mountain lion lovers on the left and anti-wolf advocates on the right. The news this week that CPW employees are facing a variety of threats from radical elements in both groups of Coloradans strikes us as ironic sad — and frightening.<\/p>\n
But in the face of unnecessary radicalism, we urge policymakers not to entrench themselves in their positions but to take a moderate approach that accepts the reality that, on both sides of the issue, there is ground to give.<\/p>\n
CPW acting director Laura Clellan told The Colorado Sun<\/a> that her staff has received anonymous threats over two mountain lions who were euthanized following a fatal attack on a runner<\/a>. And after the release of 15 gray wolves into Colorado, CPW staff were followed during operations and threatened with violence.<\/p>\n We expect healthy and robust debate about Colorado\u2019s wildlife management practices, but both sides of these issues have gone crazy. This outlandish and harassing behavior must stop.<\/p>\n Hunting is a vital part of our wildlife management, our economy and our Western culture as is Colorado Parks and Wildlife\u2019s ability to euthanize animals who pose a threat to humans. The Denver Post editorial board opposed a ban on mountain lion hunting<\/a> in 2024\u2019s Proposition 127. But we also supported the reintroduction of wolves<\/a> in Colorado in 2020\u2019s Proposition 114. The wolves are native to Colorado and could help our ecosystems find the right balance between predator and prey.<\/p>\n From this middle-ground position, we can call for both sides to simmer down.<\/p>\n Because from our vantage of impartiality, we can see plainly that mountain lion hunting needs much more regulation to protect the apex predator from being overly culled. The ban simply went too far.<\/p>\n And we can see plainly that the reintroduction of wolves has not gone well for the wolves or for the ranchers whose livelihoods have been impacted by wolf depredation.<\/p>\n Neither of those realizations requires a revolution. A strongly worded letter to state officials or reintroduction of ballot measures to change state law could suffice in both instances of policy failure.<\/p>\n Accusations that CPW staff is acting inappropriately or that they are out to get Coloradans who have different ideas for how our wildlife should be managed are both inappropriate and inaccurate. There is no conspiracy to protect mountain lion hunters or the guides who make money pursuing the big cats for clients. There is no conspiracy to chase Colorado ranchers off of public lands with marauding bands of gray wolves.<\/p>\n What we do know is that a Colorado woman was recently killed by a mountain lion while on a heavily used trail near an established neighborhood in Estes Park. The tragic death followed months of reports of mountain lions that appeared to no longer fear humans. Euthanizing those animals was the right decision.<\/p>\n Hunting lions can contribute to the animals retaining a natural fear of humans and dogs. Not banning hunting was the right call. However, the tragic death also shouldn\u2019t lead to vehement anti-lion sentiment like we are seeing with gray wolves.<\/p>\n Apex predators are a critical part of our ecosystem, and while they always pose a risk to humans, managing them, not eradicating them, is the right path.<\/p>\n