For 125 years, U.S. Senators were selected by state legislatures. That changed in 1913, when the nation saw it fit to ensure that voters got to choose who represented them by passing the 17th Amendment.<\/p>\n
More than 100 years later, Colorado voters could be left out of the process of selecting our representative to the upper chamber of Congress.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s not how democracy should work. And the Colorado General Assembly should do something about it.<\/p>\n
Colorado will elect a new governor this fall. If that governor turns out to be Sen. Michael Bennet<\/a>, voters will have no say in who serves them in the Senate. That\u2019s because Sen. Bennet \u00a0says he \u201cwill be in the position to pick the replacement.”<\/a><\/p>\n No ballots will be cast. Voters likely won\u2019t even know the names being considered for our state\u2019s highest federal office until after the decision has been made. If Bennet is elected governor, that decision will fall to him alone \u2013 taking advantage of a flaw in the current system that must be corrected.<\/p>\n Bennet has been routinely pressed on the issue on the campaign trail, and campaign supporters were recently directed to tell anyone who asked: \u201cThere will be some really great, young Democrat who is there to vote exactly the same way that Michael votes.”<\/p>\n Voters deserve better. Bennet should either say now who intends to appoint or — to remove even a hint of impropriety \u2014 promise to resign his Senate seat should he win the governor\u2019s race and let Gov. Polis make the appointment before leaving office. Then, the legislature should come up with a fix moving forward that puts the decision in the hands of voters \u2014 which is already how it works in Colorado for U.S. House vacancies.<\/p>\n It\u2019s my view that once Sen. Bennet thinks on it a bit — he will agree.<\/p>\n Colorado law gives governors the authority to fill Senate vacancies without any restrictions other than that the appointee satisfy constitutional requirements for the office. Sen. Bennet, whose third full term isn\u2019t up until 2028, has confirmed his intention to make use of that authority upon election — foregoing even the marginally preferable option of allowing current Gov. Polis to appoint a replacement \u2014 and retaining his Senate seat should he lose the gubernatorial election.<\/p>\n One of the major problems with the current system is it gives Bennet an unfair advantage over his competition \u2013 anyone who would like to be the senator of our state (which is a lot of people) will feel huge pressure to support Bennet for senator.<\/p>\n Although I have no reason to doubt his good intentions, one cannot help but think of the debacle of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, who was sentenced (and ultimately pardoned by President Trump) on charges of trying to profit from his power to appoint someone to President Barack Obama’s vacated Senate seat.<\/p>\n While Bennet\u2019s decision — should he be elected governor \u2014 to select his replacement falls within the legal authority of the governor\u2019s office, the perception of a conflict (in which those considered or, ultimately, appointed must kiss the proverbial ring) is simply too great. Anyone and everyone with a desire to be chosen to serve as senator (which comes with a huge, unearned incumbency advantage in the next election cycle) will feel pressure to play along.<\/p>\n I believe voters, not politicians, should have the final say on who represents them in Washington, D.C. A special election was held when Rep. Ken Buck vacated his Congressional District 4 seat in 2024, and the state legislature needs to give voters the right to pick their senator back.<\/p>\n Following the Blagojevich saga, several states passed laws either removing the power of appointment from governors entirely or allowing brief placeholder appointments until voters could fill the vacancy through a special election. Methods vary, and details like election timelines and whether custodial appointees are eligible to run must be considered before passing such laws in Colorado. Polling shows the commonsense point you would expect: A clear majority of Coloradans want to vote to pick their senator, not have them appointed.<\/p>\n As a starting point, I would suggest a special election be held to fill the vacancy as soon as practical, and a placeholder appointed \u2013 either by the governor or the legislature \u2013 only to ensure Coloradans are represented in the Senate until voters quickly select the replacement to fill the remainder of the term.<\/p>\n While some might decry the cost of holding a special election, I assert that a democracy that’s in the hands of voters \u2013 not politicians \u2013 is worth it. At least 15 other states have proven that by already establishing such a system, several in response to the Blagojevich mess. But let\u2019s get serious: It does not take being a criminal to want to use this absolute power without creating in the appointee some sense of obligation or without having them commit to policy positions they would not otherwise.<\/p>\n The infringement upon the democratic process that vacancy appointments impose must be recognized and addressed without any further delay. Bennet’s gubernatorial run has brought this issue to the forefront, but it\u2019s hardly an isolated incident. We’ve seen a plethora of vacancies in our state legislature (so much that in the last few years as many as one in three lawmakers arrived via appointment) and it’s not out of the realm of possibility that U.S. Senate vacancies could surge as well.<\/p>\n